189 versus 190 versus 491 skilled visa comparison

189 vs 190 vs 491 Visas: Which Skilled Pathway Is Strongest?

189 vs 190 vs 491 visas differ in their selection process, visa status, points advantage, nomination requirements and practical obligations. The strongest pathway is not automatically the visa with the most attractive conditions. It is the pathway that best matches your occupation, defensible points, state access, evidence and willingness to meet its requirements.

Simon’s Principle

The strongest skilled visa is the pathway whose legal requirements, selection mechanism and practical conditions best match the applicant’s actual profile.

189, 190 and 491 Visa Comparison at a Glance

Issue Subclass 189 Subclass 190 Subclass 491
Visa status at grant Permanent Permanent Provisional for five years
Nomination or sponsorship Not required State or territory nomination required State or territory nomination, or eligible-family sponsorship
Additional points 0 5 15
Who selects the applicant? Commonwealth through SkillSelect invitation rounds State or territory selection followed by invitation State or territory selection, or Commonwealth invitation under the family-sponsored route
Regional framework No regional restriction No visa condition limiting residence to regional Australia, but state settlement commitments matter Must live, work and study within the designated-regional framework
Main advantage Independence and permanent residence from grant Permanent residence plus access to state selection Fifteen points and potentially broader regional pathways
Main risk Federal invitation competition may be very high State nomination is selective and can change The regional and provisional pathway must be genuinely workable
Typical strategic fit Highly competitive applicant who does not need state support Applicant whose occupation and circumstances align with a state program Applicant with a credible regional pathway or eligible regional relative

The table shows the structural differences.

It does not by itself identify which visa is strongest for a particular applicant.

That depends on:

  • the nominated occupation;
  • the occupation list applying to each pathway;
  • the defensible points score;
  • English;
  • state nomination access;
  • current location and employment;
  • family sponsorship eligibility;
  • willingness to live regionally;
  • the evidence available at invitation.

What do subclasses 189, 190 and 491 have in common?

The points-tested streams of subclasses 189, 190 and 491 share several foundational requirements.

Applicants commonly need to:

  • nominate an eligible skilled occupation;
  • hold a suitable skills assessment for that occupation;
  • meet the applicable age requirement at invitation;
  • meet at least the required English standard;
  • reach the minimum points threshold;
  • submit an Expression of Interest through SkillSelect;
  • receive an invitation before applying for the visa;
  • prove every claim made in the EOI;
  • meet health and character criteria.

An EOI is required for all three pathways

The applicant uses SkillSelect to express interest in one or more eligible skilled visas.

The EOI is not:

  • a visa application;
  • an approval of the points claimed;
  • a guarantee of invitation;
  • a guarantee of state nomination.

All three are invitation-based

The applicant cannot simply choose a subclass and lodge a valid points-tested application without first receiving the relevant invitation.

The points must be defensible

Regardless of the subclass selected, the invited score must be supported by evidence relating to:

  • English;
  • qualifications;
  • skilled employment;
  • partner circumstances;
  • Australian study;
  • regional study;
  • NAATI or professional year claims;
  • nomination or family sponsorship.

Read more about Expression of Interest Australia and Australian Migration Points.

How does the subclass 189 visa work?

The subclass 189 Skilled Independent visa is a permanent visa for invited skilled workers who do not rely on state nomination or family sponsorship.

Main features of subclass 189

  • Permanent residence from grant;
  • no state or territory nomination;
  • no regional residence framework;
  • no nominating employer;
  • no nomination points;
  • selection through Commonwealth SkillSelect invitation rounds.

Main advantage

The applicant is not dependent on:

  • a state nomination program;
  • a regional relative;
  • an employer;
  • a state settlement commitment.

Main strategic risk

Because the applicant receives no nomination points and does not pass through a state selection process, the subclass 189 pathway can be highly competitive.

An applicant may be legally eligible but receive no invitation because:

  • the points score is too low;
  • the occupation receives limited invitations;
  • stronger EOIs rank ahead;
  • federal invitation settings do not favour the occupation.

Who may be well suited to subclass 189?

Subclass 189 may be strongest where the applicant has:

  • a currently invited occupation;
  • a highly competitive defensible score;
  • strong English;
  • clear employment evidence;
  • no need for nomination points;
  • a realistic invitation timetable.

Read the full 189 Visa Australia guide.

How does the subclass 190 visa work?

The subclass 190 Skilled Nominated visa is a permanent visa requiring nomination by an Australian state or territory government.

Main features of subclass 190

  • Permanent residence from grant;
  • state or territory nomination required;
  • five additional migration points;
  • state-specific eligibility and selection criteria;
  • an expectation of genuine commitment to the nominating jurisdiction.

Main advantage

State nomination can create an opportunity for an applicant who may not be competitive for subclass 189.

The five points can also improve the total score.

Main strategic risk

Nomination is not automatic merely because:

  • the occupation appears on a state list;
  • the applicant has at least 65 points;
  • the applicant satisfies the federal visa requirements;
  • an EOI has been submitted.

The state or territory may independently consider:

  • occupation priority;
  • onshore or offshore residence;
  • local employment;
  • salary;
  • English;
  • work experience;
  • state study;
  • regional connection;
  • available allocation.

Who may be well suited to subclass 190?

Subclass 190 may be strongest where:

  • the applicant fits a current state pathway;
  • the occupation is a jurisdictional priority;
  • the applicant has local employment or another state connection;
  • the five points make a material difference;
  • permanent residence from grant is important;
  • the applicant genuinely intends to settle in the nominating state.

Read the full 190 Visa Australia guide.

How does the subclass 491 visa work?

The subclass 491 Skilled Work Regional visa is a provisional skilled visa for applicants who are:

  • nominated by an Australian state or territory government; or
  • sponsored by an eligible family member living in designated regional Australia.

Main features of subclass 491

  • Five-year provisional visa;
  • 15 additional migration points;
  • designated-regional living, working and study framework;
  • state-nominated and family-sponsored routes;
  • potential later pathway to subclass 191 permanent residence.

Main advantage

The 15 points and regional nomination opportunities can make subclass 491 much more realistic than subclass 189 or 190 for some applicants.

Main strategic risk

Subclass 491 should not be selected merely because it adds 15 points.

The applicant and accompanying family should be able to:

  • live in designated regional Australia;
  • work or build a career regionally;
  • comply with the visa conditions;
  • maintain the pathway long enough to pursue subclass 191;
  • accept that permanent residence is not granted immediately.

Who may be well suited to subclass 491?

Subclass 491 may be strongest where:

  • the applicant has a viable regional state pathway;
  • the occupation is needed regionally;
  • the applicant has regional employment;
  • subclass 190 selection is unlikely;
  • subclass 189 invitation prospects are weak;
  • an eligible regional relative can sponsor;
  • the applicant genuinely accepts regional residence.

Read the full 491 Visa Australia guide.

State-nominated versus family-sponsored subclass 491

The two subclass 491 routes should not be treated as interchangeable.

Issue State-nominated 491 Family-sponsored 491
Supporting party State or territory government Eligible family member in designated regional Australia
Selection process Jurisdiction selects applicants according to its own program Commonwealth invitation process after eligible sponsorship is identified
Occupation access Depends on federal and state pathway settings Depends on the occupation framework applying to the family-sponsored route
Main advantage Can align with regional workforce priorities Does not require state nomination where an eligible relative exists
Main misconception Meeting state minimums guarantees nomination Having an eligible relative guarantees invitation

Family sponsorship does not create an automatic invitation

The relative supports eligibility for that route.

The applicant must still:

  • have an eligible occupation;
  • hold a suitable skills assessment;
  • meet the points and English requirements;
  • submit an EOI;
  • receive an invitation;
  • satisfy the visa criteria.

Permanent versus provisional skilled visas

Subclass 189 and subclass 190 are permanent visas at grant.

Subclass 491 is provisional.

Permanent residence from grant

A subclass 189 or 190 holder becomes an Australian permanent resident when the visa is granted.

That generally provides:

  • indefinite residence in Australia;
  • access to Medicare;
  • work and study rights;
  • the ability to sponsor eligible relatives;
  • a potential future citizenship pathway, subject to separate requirements.

Subclass 491 is a staged pathway

A subclass 491 holder receives a five-year provisional visa.

Permanent residence is not automatic after time passes.

The holder must later qualify for and apply for the relevant permanent pathway.

Provisional does not mean strategically inferior

A provisional pathway that is realistically accessible may be stronger than a permanent visa for which the applicant is unlikely to receive an invitation.

The comparison should therefore be:

Which pathway can this applicant realistically obtain and complete?

not merely:

Which visa has the most attractive status at grant?

How many points do subclasses 189, 190 and 491 add?

Pathway Additional points When the points arise
Subclass 189 0 No nomination or sponsorship points apply
Subclass 190 5 When the applicant receives qualifying state or territory nomination
Subclass 491 15 When the applicant has qualifying state nomination or eligible-family sponsorship

Do not count nomination points as though nomination already exists

An applicant may describe their score as:

  • 75 points for subclass 189;
  • 80 points for subclass 190;
  • 90 points for subclass 491.

Only the 75-point base score exists independently.

The additional points depend on obtaining the relevant nomination or sponsorship.

More points do not automatically mean the better pathway

A 90-point subclass 491 profile may still be weak where:

  • no state accepts the applicant;
  • no eligible relative exists;
  • the occupation is unavailable;
  • the regional plan is not genuine.

An 80-point subclass 190 profile may be much stronger where:

  • the applicant is already working in the state;
  • the occupation is prioritised;
  • the evidence is ready;
  • the applicant fits the current selection program.

How invitation and nomination work for each visa

Subclass 189

The applicant submits an EOI and waits for a Commonwealth invitation round.

Submitting an EOI does not guarantee invitation.

Subclass 190

A state or territory generally identifies or invites an eligible applicant through its own process.

The jurisdiction then nominates the applicant through SkillSelect, triggering the visa invitation process.

State-nominated subclass 491

The state or territory uses its own criteria and priorities to select applicants for regional nomination.

Family-sponsored subclass 491

The applicant relies on an eligible regional family sponsor but remains subject to Commonwealth invitation settings.

The same EOI may support multiple preferences

Depending on the applicant’s circumstances and state strategy, the EOI may indicate interest in:

  • subclass 189;
  • subclass 190;
  • subclass 491;
  • one or more states or territories.

Those settings should be chosen deliberately.

Selecting every option without checking eligibility can create:

  • inaccurate expectations;
  • state-interest conflicts;
  • poorly targeted registrations;
  • claims inconsistent with the applicant’s real intentions.

Do the same occupations qualify for 189, 190 and 491?

No single occupation list applies universally across every skilled visa and state program.

Subclass 189 occupation access

The occupation must be available for the relevant subclass 189 points-tested framework.

Subclass 190 occupation access

The occupation must be eligible federally and accepted under the nominating state or territory’s current pathway.

Subclass 491 occupation access

Occupation access may differ between:

  • state-nominated subclass 491;
  • family-sponsored subclass 491;
  • individual state and territory programs.

An occupation on a list does not guarantee practical access

A jurisdiction may restrict the pathway according to:

  • onshore or offshore residence;
  • local employment;
  • work experience;
  • salary;
  • industry sector;
  • regional location;
  • state study;
  • invitation ranking.

Read more about the Skilled Occupation List Australia and Skilled Occupation Strategy Australia.

State commitments and regional obligations

Subclass 189

Subclass 189 does not depend on state nomination and does not impose a regional residence framework.

Subclass 190

Subclass 190 is permanent at grant, but the nomination is given because the applicant has represented a genuine intention to live and settle in the nominating jurisdiction.

Applicants should not treat state nomination as five free points while intending immediately to disregard the nominating state.

Subclass 491

Subclass 491 holders are subject to the designated-regional framework.

That framework should be considered in relation to:

  • residence;
  • employment;
  • study;
  • family relocation;
  • future subclass 191 eligibility.

Regional Australia is broader than many applicants assume

Designated regional Australia includes many major cities and large population centres outside Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane.

However, the exact postcode framework should be checked before relying on a particular location.

How does subclass 491 lead to subclass 191 permanent residence?

Subclass 491 does not automatically convert into permanent residence.

An eligible holder may later apply for the subclass 191 Permanent Residence (Skilled Regional) visa.

Key strategic points

The applicant generally needs to:

  • hold an eligible provisional regional visa for the required period;
  • comply with the applicable visa conditions;
  • provide the required Australian Taxation Office notices of assessment;
  • satisfy the subclass 191 criteria applying at the time of application.

No prescribed minimum taxable-income threshold

There is currently no prescribed minimum income threshold for the regional provisional stream of subclass 191.

That does not mean income and tax records are irrelevant.

The applicant must still provide the required tax documentation and satisfy the remaining legal criteria.

The three-year point is not an automatic grant date

Reaching the required holding period may allow the applicant to become eligible to apply.

A separate subclass 191 application and decision are still required.

When is subclass 189 the strongest pathway?

Subclass 189 may be strongest where:

  • the applicant has a highly competitive base score;
  • the occupation receives Commonwealth invitations;
  • the points do not depend on nomination;
  • the evidence is complete and defensible;
  • no state settlement commitment is desired;
  • the expected invitation timeframe is realistic.

Subclass 189 is less attractive where:

  • the occupation receives few invitations;
  • the base score is ordinary;
  • age points will soon decline;
  • state or employer pathways are available now;
  • the applicant is waiting mainly because subclass 189 feels preferable.

When is subclass 190 the strongest pathway?

Subclass 190 may be strongest where:

  • the applicant fits a state’s current criteria and priorities;
  • local employment strengthens the profile;
  • the occupation is actively selected by the state;
  • five points materially improve the score;
  • the applicant genuinely wants to live in that state;
  • permanent residence from grant is strategically important.

Subclass 190 is less realistic where:

  • the occupation is merely listed but not being selected;
  • the applicant is ineligible because of residence or employment rules;
  • the applicant applies indiscriminately to every state;
  • the applicant has no genuine commitment to the jurisdiction;
  • the nomination allocation is highly constrained.

When is subclass 491 the strongest pathway?

Subclass 491 may be strongest where:

  • the applicant needs the 15 nomination or sponsorship points;
  • a regional state pathway matches the applicant’s employment;
  • the occupation is needed regionally;
  • subclass 189 prospects are weak;
  • subclass 190 nomination is unlikely;
  • the applicant is approaching an age or document deadline;
  • regional residence is genuinely acceptable;
  • an eligible regional relative provides a family-sponsored route.

Subclass 491 is less appropriate where:

  • the applicant will not live regionally;
  • the family will not relocate;
  • no state or family route exists;
  • the applicant treats the 15 points as automatic;
  • the pathway is selected without planning for subclass 191.

Should you select more than one skilled visa pathway?

In many cases, it is sensible to keep more than one genuinely available pathway open.

Examples

An applicant may express interest in:

  • subclass 189 and subclass 190;
  • subclass 190 and subclass 491;
  • all three pathways;
  • different pathways for different states.

Multiple preferences are useful where:

  • each pathway is genuinely available;
  • the applicant would accept each outcome;
  • the state selections are accurate;
  • the evidence supports every score;
  • the applicant understands the different obligations.

Multiple preferences are not useful where:

  • the applicant will reject subclass 491 if invited;
  • the applicant has no state eligibility;
  • the EOI includes states the applicant will not live in;
  • the points have been inflated differently for each pathway;
  • the strategy relies on incompatible representations.

When employer sponsorship may be stronger than 189, 190 or 491

Points-tested migration should not be assessed in isolation.

Employer sponsorship may be stronger where:

  • the applicant has specialised experience;
  • Australian employers need the applicant’s skills;
  • the points score is weak;
  • no state pathway is available;
  • the occupation is commercially valuable but invitation activity is limited;
  • the applicant is approaching the points-tested age limit;
  • a regional employer offers a credible role.

Points strength and labour-market strength are different

An applicant can have:

  • a strong professional profile but weak SkillSelect points;
  • a high points score but little employer demand;
  • excellent regional employer prospects but no subclass 190 access.

Read more about Employer-Sponsored Visas Australia.

What I see when applicants compare the 189, 190 and 491 visas

The applicant selects only subclass 189 because it appears unrestricted

The applicant has an ordinary base score and a realistic subclass 491 state pathway.

They refuse to consider it because they want permanent residence immediately.

Years pass without a subclass 189 invitation while:

  • age points decline;
  • English evidence expires;
  • the regional opportunity closes.

The applicant prefers subclass 190 but has no state access

The applicant repeatedly says:

I want the 190.

But:

  • the occupation is not open offshore;
  • local employment is required;
  • the applicant does not meet the state pathway;
  • the state is not selecting the profile.

Visa preference does not create nomination eligibility.

The applicant treats 15 points as the subclass 491 strategy

The applicant calculates a much stronger score but has:

  • no state nomination pathway;
  • no eligible family sponsor;
  • no willingness to relocate regionally.

The extra points exist only on a calculator.

The applicant selects every state

The EOI shows interest in every jurisdiction.

The applicant has not checked:

  • occupation access;
  • residence criteria;
  • employment rules;
  • state commitment;
  • whether the jurisdictions accept broad or exclusive interest.

The applicant claims nomination points before nomination

The applicant says they have 90 points for subclass 491.

The true position is:

  • 75 independent points;
  • 90 only if nomination or eligible-family sponsorship is obtained.

The applicant assumes a family sponsor guarantees subclass 491

The relative may satisfy the relationship and regional criteria.

The applicant still needs:

  • an eligible occupation;
  • a suitable assessment;
  • sufficient points;
  • an invitation;
  • a valid visa application.

The applicant wants subclass 491 but not regional life

The visa is chosen for the 15 points.

The applicant’s real intention is to live in Sydney, Melbourne or Brisbane as soon as possible.

That is not a workable subclass 491 strategy.

The applicant ignores employer sponsorship

A qualified specialist spends years trying to raise the EOI score.

An Australian employer is willing to offer a genuine position, but sponsorship is dismissed because the applicant believes skilled independent migration is inherently better.

The applicant assumes permanent always means safer

A permanent visa is more attractive at grant.

But an inaccessible permanent visa is not necessarily a safer strategy than a provisional pathway the applicant can realistically obtain and complete.

Fictional worked example: Comparing one applicant across 189, 190 and 491

This is a fictional example created to explain skilled visa pathway selection. It is not a real client matter.

Leila is a 34-year-old civil engineer living and working in regional Australia.

Her defensible base score is:

  • 25 points for age;
  • 20 points for superior English;
  • 15 points for qualifications;
  • 10 points for skilled employment;
  • 5 points for Australian study;
  • 10 points because she is single.

Her independent score is:

85 points

Subclass 189 position

Leila can submit an EOI for subclass 189 if her occupation is eligible.

However:

  • invitation activity in her occupation is limited;
  • there is no guarantee that 85 points will produce an invitation;
  • she has an age-point reduction approaching.

Subclass 189 remains possible but is not the strongest immediate pathway.

Subclass 190 position

With state nomination, Leila would have:

90 points

However, the state’s subclass 190 pathway currently prioritises a narrower group and Leila does not satisfy the required local-employment period.

She is federally eligible but not presently well positioned for subclass 190 nomination.

Subclass 491 position

With state nomination, Leila would have:

100 points

She also:

  • works in regional infrastructure;
  • lives in the nominating jurisdiction;
  • has an occupation prioritised for regional nomination;
  • has consistent employment evidence;
  • intends to remain regionally.

Subclass 491 is provisional, but it is the pathway most closely aligned with her current circumstances.

Employer-sponsored alternative

Leila’s employer may also be willing to consider regional employer sponsorship.

That option should remain under review rather than assuming general skilled migration is the only strategy.

The strategic conclusion

Leila may keep subclass 189 selected while pursuing subclass 491 nomination.

She should not delay the stronger current regional pathway merely because subclass 189 or 190 would provide permanent residence immediately.

The best present strategy is the pathway whose selection criteria and practical conditions already fit her profile—not the pathway she would choose in an imaginary world where every invitation was available.

Common mistakes when comparing 189, 190 and 491 visas

Assuming subclass 189 is always the best visa

Its independence and permanent status are attractive, but invitation prospects may be weak.

Assuming subclass 190 nomination is automatic

Federal eligibility does not compel a state or territory to nominate.

Rejecting subclass 491 because it is provisional

A realistic provisional pathway may be stronger than waiting indefinitely for an inaccessible permanent visa.

Selecting subclass 491 only for the points

The regional framework must be genuinely acceptable and workable.

Counting nomination points before nomination

Subclass 190 and 491 points depend on obtaining the relevant nomination or sponsorship.

Assuming family sponsorship guarantees invitation

The family-sponsored route remains invitation-based and subject to the full visa criteria.

Comparing visa conditions without comparing selection prospects

The most attractive visa conditions are irrelevant if the applicant is unlikely to receive an invitation.

Using one occupation analysis for every pathway

Occupation access can differ across subclasses, states and the two subclass 491 routes.

Selecting every state without checking eligibility

State nomination is jurisdiction-specific and should reflect genuine eligibility and intentions.

Ignoring state commitment

Subclass 190 nomination is not merely a mechanism for obtaining five points.

Assuming subclass 491 becomes permanent automatically

A separate subclass 191 application and decision are required.

Ignoring employer sponsorship

The applicant may be stronger in the labour market than in SkillSelect.

Waiting without a fallback strategy

An EOI should be monitored alongside:

  • age;
  • English validity;
  • assessment validity;
  • state program changes;
  • employer opportunities.

189 vs 190 vs 491 Visa: Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main difference between the 189, 190 and 491 visas?

Subclass 189 is an independent permanent visa. Subclass 190 is a permanent visa requiring state or territory nomination. Subclass 491 is a five-year provisional regional visa requiring state or territory nomination or eligible-family sponsorship.

Which visa gives the most additional points?

Subclass 491 provides 15 additional points. Subclass 190 provides five. Subclass 189 provides no nomination or sponsorship points.

Is subclass 189 better than subclass 190?

Not automatically. Subclass 189 offers independence, but subclass 190 may be more realistic where a state is willing to nominate the applicant.

Is subclass 190 better than subclass 491?

Subclass 190 provides permanent residence from grant, but subclass 491 may offer stronger selection prospects and 15 points. The better pathway depends on state access and whether regional residence is workable.

Is subclass 491 easier than subclass 190?

Not necessarily. Some states offer more subclass 491 opportunities, but the applicant must still satisfy state selection criteria and the regional visa framework.

Can I submit one EOI for 189, 190 and 491?

An EOI can indicate interest in more than one eligible skilled visa pathway. The settings should accurately reflect the applicant’s circumstances and genuine willingness to accept each pathway.

Can I apply for subclass 189 without state nomination?

Yes. The subclass 189 points-tested stream does not require state or territory nomination.

Can I apply for subclass 190 without state nomination?

No. State or territory nomination is an essential part of the subclass 190 pathway.

Can I apply for subclass 491 without state nomination?

Potentially. An applicant may instead qualify through sponsorship by an eligible family member living in designated regional Australia.

Does family sponsorship guarantee a subclass 491 invitation?

No. The applicant must still satisfy the occupation, assessment, age, English and points requirements and receive an invitation.

Is subclass 491 a permanent visa?

No. It is a five-year provisional visa that may provide a later pathway to subclass 191 permanent residence where the applicable requirements are met.

Does subclass 491 automatically become subclass 191 after three years?

No. The holder must qualify for and lodge a separate subclass 191 application. Permanent residence is not automatic.

Is there a minimum income threshold for subclass 191?

There is currently no prescribed minimum income threshold for the regional provisional stream. Applicants must still provide the required Australian Taxation Office notices of assessment and satisfy the other subclass 191 criteria.

Can a subclass 491 holder live in Sydney, Melbourne or Brisbane?

Subclass 491 is subject to the designated-regional framework. Applicants should check whether their intended postcode is within designated regional Australia.

Does subclass 190 require me to remain in the nominating state forever?

Subclass 190 is a permanent visa, but nomination is based on the applicant’s genuine intention to live and settle in the nominating jurisdiction. Those representations should be made honestly.

Does subclass 189 always require more points than subclass 190 or 491?

The legal threshold is not necessarily different, but subclass 189 applicants do not receive nomination points and may face stronger federal invitation competition.

Can I claim the five or 15 points before nomination?

The points depend on qualifying nomination or sponsorship. They should not be treated as independently secured before that support exists.

Which visa is best for permanent residence?

Subclass 189 and 190 provide permanent residence from grant. Subclass 491 provides a provisional regional pathway that may later lead to subclass 191. The strongest option is the one the applicant can realistically obtain and complete.

Should I wait for subclass 189 instead of accepting subclass 491?

That depends on occupation, score, invitation prospects, age, state access and willingness to live regionally. Waiting for a preferred visa can be risky where a realistic regional pathway is already available.

Can employer sponsorship be better than all three pathways?

Yes. An applicant with strong employer demand may have a more realistic sponsored pathway than a points-tested invitation pathway.

Official skilled visa resources

About Simon Mander

Simon Mander is a Registered Migration Agent (MARN 0318058) with more than 23 years of experience in Australian migration.

His skilled migration work includes comparing subclass 189, 190 and 491 pathways, assessing defensible migration points, occupation and skills-assessment viability, state nomination, regional strategies and employer-sponsored alternatives.

The objective is not simply to identify the visa with the most attractive conditions. It is to identify the pathway whose eligibility rules, selection process and practical obligations provide the strongest realistic route for the applicant.

Compare your skilled migration pathways

A paid consultation can assess your occupation, skills assessment, English, defensible points, Expression of Interest, subclass 189 prospects, subclass 190 state options, subclass 491 regional pathways and employer-sponsored alternatives.

The purpose is to identify which pathways are legally available, which are competitively realistic and which conditions you and your family can genuinely meet.


Book a Paid Consultation

This information is general in nature and does not constitute migration advice for your individual circumstances. Australian migration law and policy can change, and eligibility should be assessed based on the circumstances existing at the time of application.